Unlimited access to all 63 drills · 3 full Ezra teach-throughs included · No card required.
- Every AFM drill, unlimited
- 3 full teach-throughs with Ezra
- No card, no commitment
AFM is not passed by learning new models — by the time you sit it, you already know them. It is passed by executing them without a slip, under a clock: the right direction, the right period, the assumption you actually developed. Gradd finds exactly where the execution broke, then Ezra coaches the fix until it stops happening.
Built on the live S26–J27 syllabus. Unlimited access to all 63 drills · 3 full Ezra teach-throughs included · No card required.
Marked in about a minute — not a self-graded model answer or a three-day wait. Free to start with a quick email sign-in.

You’ve got a rate — but is it an instruction the board could act on? Buy or sell? Which contract month?
Check your basis period again. That’s exactly where AFM’s own examiner reports say this mark is lost.
The answer stays sealed. Ezra teaches until your answer is strong enough to score.
Your result slip tells you the score. It doesn't tell you whether the arithmetic was the problem at all. Answer three quick steps — your score, how each area went, and six honest questions about how you write — and get a personalised resit plan. Most AFM marks are lost after the calculation: the figure is right and the discussion never uses it. No sign-up needed to see your plan.
Five AFM examiner reports in a row point at the same thing: the arithmetic is usually competent. What fails is precision under a clock — a direction never stated, a period miscounted, an assumption listed but never developed.
Contract count right. Sell direction right. Both the rate-rise and rate-fall scenarios reconcile to the same 4.95% — so the answer reads as confirmed.
The 0.15pp unexpired basis was never subtracted from the closing futures price. The omission applies equally to both scenarios, so the candidate’s own cross-check reconciles just as cleanly at the wrong rate as at the right one.
Subtracting the unexpired basis gives 4.80%, not 4.95% — a 0.15pp gap, one-to-one with the omission. Scored component by component: 2 of 7 pass; every one of the 5 failures traces to that single missed step, not five separate errors.
The candidate’s own self-check will not catch this. Marking has to.
AFM’s numbers are usually right — five examiner reports in a row say so. What fails is precision under a clock: an unstated direction, a wrong period, a discussion abandoned once a calculation goes wrong. Gradd finds exactly where the execution broke, and Ezra coaches the fix.
Ezra doesn’t hand you the reference working — he finds precisely where your figure diverged and coaches from there. The answer stays sealed until you’ve earned it.
A hedge answer is a set of instructions to the board — direction, contract month, whole number of contracts — not just a final figure. Gradd checks every component AFM’s own examiner reports say candidates miss.
Ten minutes spent on a calculation nobody asked for. A discussion abandoned after one wrong number, when the marks after it were still earnable. An assumption listed but never developed. The exact patterns five AFM examiner reports name, coached out of you.
A fifth of every AFM answer is professional skills. Five examiner reports in a row flag the same gap: assumptions accepted without challenge, a director’s claim taken at face value, a stated board constraint ignored. Gradd marks them against AFM’s own published descriptors — and names the evidence.
Structure, a decisive conclusion, report style.
Developed points, a recommendation that follows from your own figures.
Challenging assumptions, a director’s claim, a stated constraint.
Business impact, scenario-specific application.
“challenged the stated 4% return target against the board’s own constraint, rather than accepting the director’s figure at face value…”
“states both NPV outcomes but stops short of a recommendation — the report ends without a decision…”
Marked against AFM’s own published professional-skills descriptors, with the evidence named.
Every AFM sitting draws a question from sections B and E — investment appraisal, financing, treasury and risk. That is where Gradd is built out first.
Live across investment appraisal & financing, treasury & risk management, and ethics & advisory — sections B, E and A. M&A and reorganisation (C, D) are next. No complete-syllabus claim.
Multi-exhibit, multi-requirement scenarios, marked as one case — not eight disconnected question marks.
On your whole answer, with evidence-cited feedback per skill, against AFM’s own published descriptors.
One 50-mark case plus two 25-mark questions, sat and timed as one paper — the same 3h 15m clock the real exam gives you.
One 50-mark case and two 25-markers, 3h 15m, one clock, marked as one paper. What comes back is not a score.
Every requirement, technical and professional skills, per-case subtotals, one paper total. Unlimited attempts. Two tutor-marked mocks elsewhere cost €59.98 and come back three days later, on a PDF.
The marker names where your working diverged — not just that it did.
“You used 95.00 and 96.80 rather than 94.85 and 96.65, so your gain was €132,000 not €168,000, so your rate was 4.95% not 4.80%.”
Requirement by requirement, against the marks available.
“End-of-paper collapse. Between submitting Q2 (ii) and finishing, 12 minutes elapsed across Q3 (i)–Q3 (ii), against a combined budget of 39 minutes.”
Measured submission to submission — not time on task.
The debrief points at drills on the syllabus area you lost marks on. Weak or competent bands only — a requirement that scored gets nothing.
| ACCA’s Practice Platform | LearnSignal mocks | Gradd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marks your written answer | You do — against a model answer | A tutor, on a PDF | Ezra, against the requirement |
| Marking turnaround | Instant, self-graded | Three days | About a minute |
| Names the step where your figure diverged | — | Tutor’s discretion | ✓ |
| Professional skills, against AFM’s own descriptors | — | Tutor’s discretion | ✓ |
| Full timed mock paper | Past papers, unmarked | Two per paper | AFM Mock Paper 1, marked as one paper |
| Attempts | Unlimited | Two per paper | Unlimited |
| Cost for the sitting | Free | €59.98 for the two | €99 for the whole sitting |
Scroll to see more →
Drills are free so you can test the method. Upgrade when you want full coaching, the practice cases, marking and the mock.
Unlimited access to all 63 drills · 3 full Ezra teach-throughs included · No card required.
Full access through your sitting — drills, cases, marking and the timed mock.
Everything in the pass, month to month.
AFM only, priced on its own — no bundle, no APM add-on required.
Start with every drill free — no card. Upgrade when you commit to the sitting.